1. Which qualitative method or methods are used in the paper? Which are the benefits and limitations of using these methods?
I have read the article The Relation Between Television Exposure and Theory of Mind Among Preschoolers. The aim of the study was to investigate if the exposure of television affects the results of Theory of Mind (ToM) testing. ToM is a phenomenon that develops during early years and is achieved when the children understand the mental states like thoughts, intentions, desires and emotions. The development of the children reflects their understanding that actions are individual, and that not everyone has the same point of reference as they do.
The qualitative method used in this paper was individual interviews. One trained person interview the 107 children participating in this study, by using a 7-task assessment of ToM. All of the 7 tasks used some kind of visual or pictorial object and the children had to answer questions about a character’s behavior or mental state and also a control question designed in the same way but targeting reality. For example when they tested Diverse beliefs, they showed the child a toy figure, a girl, and drawings of a garage and bushes. The toy girl, they named Linda and the interviewer told the child that Linda was looking for her missing cat and that it was probably in the bushes or the garage. The first question the child had to answer was: “Where do you think the cat is? In the bushes or in the garage?” The child got the response that the answer was good but that Linda believes her cat is in the (opposite place). Then the child had to answer where they think Linda would look for her cat and if the answer was the opposite from the first answer then it was marked as correct. The same types of scenarios were repeated in the six following tasks.
One of the benefits is that the participant being interviewed alone, can’t be influenced by other participants and therefore answer pretty honestly. I can be intimidating being interviewed in a larger group and in individual interviews the participant get all the attention and total focus all the time. One limitation is the time, it takes more time to have individual interviews, than for example, focus groups.
2. What did you learn about qualitative methods from reading the paper?
I learned that you need to be very specific when you are interviewing children since it might be difficult for them to interpret certain questions. The approach is different since it might be hard to have the same time span interviewing children as adults. The interviews in the paper were approximately 15 minutes and afterwards the children received gifts, like a notebook and a pen as a reward. I have never interviewed children so therefore I think this study was interesting.
3. Which are the main methodological problems of the study? How could the use of the qualitative method or methods have been improved?
I think the main methodological problem was that you had to really make the children understand the tasks they were given. Also it was important not to influence the children in any way, they had to really think for themselves and try to figure out an answer.
PART 2:
1. Briefly explain to a first year university student what a case study is.
A case study is a kind of research strategy, which focuses on investigating phenomenon on a deeper level. Often when case studies are being used they include both data collection, like interviews, questionnaires, and observations. There can be different goals to achieve while using case studies, for example to provide a description or test a theory.
Use the "Process of Building Theory from Case Study Research" (Eisenhardt, summarized in Table 1) to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of your selected paper.
I have chosen the paper The Presence of Hyperlinks on Social Network Sites: A Case Study of Cyworld in Korea, which investigates how hyperlinks are being used in social networks (Cyworld in this case) when users are posting comments. Hyperlinks are used to connect users to for example events, political agendas or video links (like YouTube).
The strengths of the paper are that the getting started part is very clear; the scholars state the question/problem in the beginning. Another next step Enfolding Literature is also a strength since they use literature that contradicts their question but use it to build the arguments and make them stronger. The study used one sort of data collection; they developed a software program to query the social network, Cyworld, and therefore gained the comments being made by users. According to Table 1, this is the third step Crafting Instruments and Protocols and should consist of multiple data collection methods. The fact that they used only one method implies a weakness in the study and also the lack of any qualitative study like Table 1 also mentions. These were the major strengths and weaknesses I discovered while reading the paper.
References:
Sams, J. & Park, Woo H. (2013) The Presence of Hyperlinks on Social Network Sites: A Case Study of Cyworld in Korea. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Online.
Nathanson, Amy I. ; Sharp, Molly L. ; Aladé, F ; Rasmussen, Eric E. ; Christy, K. (2013) The Relation Between Television Exposure and Theory of Mind Among Preschoolers.
Journal of Communication, 2013, Vol.63, pp.1088-1108
Hi Marit, it seems like a very interesting qualitative paper that you have read. Were there any interesting conclusions made from the authors? I am impressed with all the interviews that they did, it feels like it is above average, with 107 subjects, when it comes to a qualitative method such as this. Just as you I have no experience in interviewing children and i think it is important when you prepare for an interview to think about who you are interviewing. As you say, children might have a harder time to interpret questions so i guess you have to develop them in a specific way.
SvaraRaderaReally interesting article you found. I think I have to read it myself. I would also, just like Filip, know if they came to any conclusions if watching TV did in fact affect their Theory of Mind. In my opinion children today in many ways have a greater awareness compared to what I can remember of myself at the same age.
SvaraRaderaAs this study was done on children I think the only option is to have the interviews separately, otherwise if one child would have answered that the cat is in the garage, then everybody would have agreed that the cat is in the garage.
Do you think when dealing with children because the researcher has to be careful what they say and how they approach subjects that the actual way in which questions are asked can sometimes influence answers and can be unintentionally misleading? I wonder if there can be any truly free of mislead data that can be collected?
SvaraRaderaHola Marit!
SvaraRadera107 interviewed children (!), if that isn't impressive - nothing is! I'm just curious to how much valuable data they could actually could use from those interviewed. If every interview took 15 minutes as you state, the authors must have spent at least 27 hours in effective time on interviews. Do you believe that they got enough valuable data for the amount of time they spent? And can it really be defined as qualitative, not quantitative considering the time and amount of participants?
Hey Marit!
SvaraRaderaI think you have received some quite interesting comments here. I would like to include myself in the discussion of conducting interviews of children. In one way I think that it should not differ much more than conducting research on adults. Questions should not be leading/misleading and whatnot. However, children probably have not developed the same level of critical thinking when receiving a question, and therefore you might have to be even more clear and mindful of what you are asking.
Hi Marit,
SvaraRaderaThe qualitative paper you have chosen fits into the earlier seminar about mass deception with Adorno and Horkheimer. I certainly enjoy reading about researches on children, because of the fact that they always speak their mind, and mostly do not reflect their thoughts before they express how they feel and think. As you highlight, it could be a problem and intimidating being interviewed in a larger group. This is something we have been discussing during seminars, where many student that have presented their articles consisting of focus groups mention that participants does not take the same space as others.